Showing posts with label Info. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Info. Show all posts

Saturday, February 28, 2009

New beginnings for Fremont, and the A's

This is a new beginning for Fremont. Many Fremont residents are now paying more attention about the issues in our communities. Please continue to follow up from these sites:
This is also a new beginning for the A's. Once Fremont is out of the picture, the A's seem to have many options. You can follow the A's news from these sites:

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Saturday, January 24, 2009

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why don't the Oakland A's stay in Oakland?
A: The A's want to build a new stadium, but cannot reach a deal with the city of Oakland.

Q: Why do the Oakland A's consider Warm Springs site now? I though they plan to have the stadium in Pacific Commons.
A: The A's cannot reach a deal with the retailers and landlord in Pacific Commons. So they now turn thier focus to the Warm Springs BART site, close to residential areas.

Q: Why do the Oakland A's want to move to Fremont?
A: Back in 2006, the A's want to move to San Jose for the south bay fan base. But Santa Clara county is Giants territory. So they chose Fremont. [Now MLB will allow the A's talk to San Jose because the territory right will be decided by 30 MLB team owners, not the Giants.]

Q: What will happen to the traffic on 880/680, Auto Mall, Osgood, Fremont, Grimmer, Warm Springs and Mission Blvd?
A: The traffic in the area is already very congested and over-capacity during weekday late afternoon commute hours. With 32000+ fans and 10,000+ cars, there will be gridlocks everywhere during game days (50% of days from April to Septembet/October). It will also affect the traffic on 237/880 and Dumbarton/84/880. Your commute time will easily be extended substantially. The A's just said they will mitigate them, but still have no detail plan. Traffic and parking are the main concerns from the Pacific Commons retailers.

Q: Will the new BART station in Warm Springs alleviate the traffic?
A: The A's are expecting 10% more BART ridership than Pacific Commons site. But the majority of fans will still drive to the stadium. Now the A's delay the new ball park opening to 2014 (in Wamr Springs NOP). But the ealiest possible time for extenstion to San Jose is 2018-20. Please keep in mind both the Warm Springs BART and San Jose extension could also be delayed because of current economic downturn and state budget cut.

Q: Is a stadium the best use of land around the planned Warm Springs BART station?
A: No. It will be very similar to the current Oakand Colesium with lots of parking lots. The traffic will be jammed during game days, and the land will be deserted during non-game days. This is certainly not the best transient-oridented development. 

Q: Wouldn't a baseball stadium in Fremont be great?
A: Only if it's properly planned. The A's mention several times about their "downtown ballpark plan" and "one stadium does not make it downtwon". Baseball stadiums do best in an active, urban setting, surrounded by supporting/complementing businesses. They work best with exisitng downtown infrastructure. You don't build a stadium and suddenly become a "downtown". Neither location in Fremont is a good fit for a stadium.

Q: Will the stadium bring extra job and tax revnue to Fremont?
A: Most of the jobs will be temporary and seasonal. Some people think a stadium will bring more business, but a stadium and bad traffic will also scare away many potential good business and high-tech companies.

Q: Didn't the A's say there is "no cost" to the city?
A: The A's need to claim this on paper to avoid a city-wide referendum and they just need to "convince" the five-member city council. The A's will get many tax-breaks and kick-back revenues. Besides, who will pay for the large bill on the infrastructure, road upgrade, maintenance, extra police, etc? Actually a stadium is a money pit. Many cities are already burdened by the cost to build/maintain a stadium, let alone Fremont doesn't even have the infrastructue of a large city.

Q: Can Fremont police handle the extra crime it will bring in?
A: Oakland's population is about twice as Fremont's, but it has 10 times more violent crimes. Does the city of Fremont have enough resource and expertise to handle the extra traffic and activities around the stadium? Do you want Fremont to be the next Oakland? Your house value will go down, while your home/car insurance will cretainly go up. 

Q: Why will the mayor and city council still support the stadium even with strong opposition?
A: Some business groups and city officlials support the stadium, even the A's proposal is flawed in may aspects. There are many behind-the-door meetings in the past two years and they believe the A's one-side story and rosy revenue numbers.

Q: Didn't the mayor just win the election?
A: The A's strategically kept the stadium issue quiet during the election. Wasserman's statement only say he will support the plan "only if it's good to Fremont". Out of the 97,523 registered voters, 67,735 cast in the mayor's race. Wasserman only get 28,461 votes (42% of votes, and 29% of registered voters).

Q: Shouldn't the mayor and city council put the residents' best interest first?
A: We hope so. Please let them know your concern. Then the public will see whether they can speak out for the residents or just being the A's rubber stamp. 

Q: Are the A's and city following the proper process?
A: Many residents and business raise the issues. The whole process is not transparent, insufficient notice to the affected businees and residetents, insufficient scope session, etc. Have you seen any public townhall meeting in tha past two years?


(please joun FCN and add comment if you have more to add)

Friday, January 23, 2009

Opposition to Industry NFL stadium plan grows

Please see http://www.nonflstadium.com/ for more information. Related news: Opposition to Industry NFL stadium plan grows 
and Industry approves NFL stadium plan over neighbors' objections. Althought there are some differences between this case and A's moving to Fremont, we can learn a few things from them:

CAN WE DEFEAT THE STADIUM? YES WE CAN!
Citizens' groups have defeated many bad projects that would have ruined our quality of life. It takes work, dedication, time, (some money), and YOU ! GET INVOLVED!  It is political pressure that defeats projects like this.  

Our Goal:  a "NO STADIUM" sign in every front yard.
Buy a "No Stadium" sign for your front yard:  only <$5?
SUPPORT politicians who oppose the stadium
DO NOT support any politician who supports the stadium 

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Latest Update

[February 2009] Fremont residents have two strong protests on 2/5 and 2/10. The A's submit new NOP for Warm Springs on 2/10. While the residents planning for a protest on 2/24 council meeting, the A's cancel their presentation to Chamber of Commerce and public hearing. Then the A's go on to cancel the Warm Springs NOP and "stop" the Pacific Commons EIR. The stadium proponents are mobilizing their supporters to save the project. On 2/24, the A's officially withdraw their plan for Fremont.

[January 2009] Residents shows up in the city council meetings and raise concerns about the Oakland A's stadium proposal. The Mayor keep saying it's premature and they cannot make a decision now, while mayor and council memebrs publicly saying to the press it's a done deal. The A's are lobbying with local Chamber of Commerce through their "A's to Fremont" organization. They actively hold invitation-only meetings in small groups right now and purposely delay any public meetings.

[December 2008] The Oakland A's announced they were seriously considering changing the location of their proposed stadium from the west side of Interstate 880 to within walking distance of a planned BART station in Warm Springs, and next to the residential area. The change of heart came after the team couldn't reach a deal with Pacific Commons Shopping Center owners over plans to handle game-day parking and traffic issues. The new stadium proposal was met with heavy resistance from residents of the Warm Springs neighborhood immediately. Meanwhile, a letter from Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig giving the team permission to consider "other communities" if the a stadium deal in Fremont didn't materialize rekindled speculation that the A's could end up in San Jose.

What we can do now

CAN WE DEFEAT THE STADIUM? YES WE CAN!
Citizens' groups have defeated many bad projects that would have ruined our quality of life. It takes work, dedication, time, (some money), and YOU ! GET INVOLVED!  It is political pressure that defeats projects like this.

Put a "NO STADIUM" sign in every front yard.

SUPPORT politicians who oppose the stadium
DO NOT support any politician who supports the stadium 

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Remove Warm Springs as alternative in EIR

The residents in Warm Springs, Mission San Jose and Irvington areas have every right to demand the city to remove Warm Springs as off-site alternative in the draft EIR. The decision process is not transparent to the public. And it has caused financial damage to the local residents. The A's is even not willing to hold any public meetings to address the residents' concerns.

"If A's is allowed to build a stadium at Warm-Spring site because A's can not reach a deal with Pacific Common shopping center owners over plans to handle game-day parking and traffic issues, it would be a 'Discriminatory Act' by the Fremont City if the City allows A's to build its stadium at the Warm Spring site because this site would have even closer proximity to many residential communities than the demand by the Pacific Shopping center owners to keep the site further away from the Pacific Common Shopping center."

Friday, January 2, 2009

Most Popular For Homebuyers

Tempting to share this blog Fremont is most popular for new homebuyers in Bay Area from Tri-City Beat (which has the link back to the original blog from The San Francisco Real Estate Blog).

I believe most people move to Fremont because of good schools, close to work, and nice neighborhood to live, etc. (location, location, location). That's why we decide to move here several years ago. We don't need a stadium to make it worse. Many potential homebuyers currently have big concern about the new stadium.

Friday, December 19, 2008

Council Meeting Video Archive

From http://www.youtube.com/user/fcnwebtv (faster).
From Fremont City web site (usually slow; first 5-6 minutes are intro).
Minutes and agendas. Some hilights:

02/02/09 Joint City Council and FUSD Meeting (public comment)
01/06/09 Lots of folks still oppose A's plan (from 0:22-0:46)
12/16/08 2008-09 budget update
12/09/08 Ballpark EIR work session and meetings
12/02/08 Cho's last day; Chan's first day; Prop 8; night club
11/18/08 Join Prop 8 law suit (from 1:52--2:23)

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

12/16 Concil Meeting Note

See 12/16 Concil Meeting Note. We should continue keeping on the pressure. We have good writers and reporters everywhere;-)

Efforts Have Them Worried!

A's 12/15 Meeting Note

Thanks the person for providing the following info:
----------------------------------
I attended the 12/15 meeting this evening and took notes of what was discussed. Please note that these are minutes of the meeting as I heard it to the best of my ability. However the overall summary is that Warm Springs is in the As mind definitely the preferred site.

It seemed that the main reason for coming was to get signatures on standardized letters of support for the As before the Thursday 4.00pm deadline. Also As did not offer any specific incentives but made general statements of incentives to the community at large once they come. This meeting was clearly for soliciting support for the As to come to Warm Springs and only open to those specifically invited. Now for the minutes and I apologize for wrongly spelled names:

Present and who spoke are:

Nina Moore, who is with the Chamber of Commerce - many probably
remember from school district days also. . She has been on the
committee of As for Fremont for the past two years. She states that
she believes that As is a good thing for economic purposes.

Jim Kaneen - consultant with the As

Paul Meneker - senior VP of Wolff Urbans and Senior VP of As

Steven Lloyd -Fremont Citizen, formed As to Fremont Support Group,
local realtor

Gloria Ritchie - consultant and resident of Fremont

Steve Cho was there as a guest and listener as was I.

There was about 12-15 other people there as guests.

Jim Kaneen and Paul Meneker spoke:

Need a baseball only stadium. First thought of Pacific Commons as
Cisco was ready to let them use their field. After great effort it
has now become apparent that there are legal obstacles as Catellus
have prohibited development of the baseball stadium on the land and
they have rights as to use of the land. So the baseball village idea
looks improbable after last Tuesday's city council meeting as that is
when Catellus officially voiced their objection. Also during the
course of research on pacific commons, feedback from other agencies
and regional leaders was that the stadium should be in a more transit
friendly site.

So now in their minds Warm Springs is the preferred site with pacific commons as the alternative.

Warm Springs seems like a great place because
-allows them to stay in Alameda County
-being on the southern tip it reaches out to fans in the South Bay as
well as possibly getting new fans.
- is much more transit friendly as can ride bart, get onto 680 more
than one way, can get onto 880 more than one way

They want to build an intimate small baseball stadium with a capacity
of 32000, and this vision is the same whether it was pacific commons
or warm springs.

Fremont is perfect for all of us because-
-we want to play in Alameda County
- we can get south bay fans and new fans to come
-create new opportunities for Fremont - construction and permanent
jobs
- can create a transit friendly stadium if at Warm Springs as
recommended
-will have housing, complimentary retail and elementary school
brought to Pacific Commons, Fremont
-can incorporate Cisco into our plans.

We plan to study both sites in equal details and make a informed
decision based on the facts, even though realistically pacific
commons may be out as catellus has asserted their rights in this
matter after 36 retailers voiced their objections to the stadium.

The residents and people of Fremont need to understand that regardless of what we do, there will be development around the warm springs station. That land will not remain empty.

Not decided exactly which part of the Warm Springs land. Only need
12 acres to build the stadium, so which 12 acres has not yet been
decided.

Bart expected in 2014.

Somebody asked if As have talked to Nummi. They said that they have met with Nummi many times and have had productive working sessions with us. Both sides are looking for win-win solution. This is in progress. Nummi' main issue is that they do not want housing at their site, but we plan on keeping the residential part at Pacific Commons anyway. Also need to understand that Nummi would be against any development in that area, didnt want Bart, no development of any kind at warm springs, stadium nor anything else nor at pacific commons as they have the just in time delivery system.

They also explained that there will be a sudden surge in traffic when entering and then when leaving but does not last long as we would have paid people quickly ushering fans' cars into parking lots. Probably will be done in 15-20 minutes.

Oakland Colliseum has about 9000 parking spots and the most that they have ever had is 8000. Cars come in quickly and leave quickly and with all the exits, traffic shouldnt be a problem.Also most games will be evening games so less of an imposition.

Bart ridership currently to As games is 20%

When moved to Warm Springs expect Bart ridership in the short term to be 15-20% in the short term but then move to 30-40% in the long term.

There will be 81 games and the season is April through September.

Will not allow access to the residential neighborhood except for residents and can possibly have resident stickers to distinguish.

We will work actively on transportation issues with our resident neighbors.

Regarding Noise -will do a technical studyon sound source. As sounds from stadium and sounds from freeway may not necessarily be additive due to bouncing, in fact may there may be some noise cancellation even

Lighting - thanks to new technology there should be limited glare

Security - will have our own private security or police - not sure
which but we will definitely have a lot of security.

Havent made detailed plans yet on parking. May come up with plan of shared use parking with Bart. Need to discuss as this may be good for us and extra revenue for Bart.

Guest asked if they would build a parking structure? They said it is too early to say. Maybe not if there is lots of land, then can just have surface parking. Have to wait and see - not got that far in
their plans.

Steve Lloyd from the As for Fremont spoke

He said that no money is to come from the Fremont Tax payer. It is on this condition that As are allowed to come here. [blogger note: THIS IS BIG LIE! They claim this, so it "does not require" city wide referendum, just need the decision from the five council members. We can still call for city wide vote!]

Stadium is to be privately financed by the Wolff family and private investors.

They love to support Fremont Communities -have already done a health fair with Washington and some other community event.

However the Warm Springs Area will get special treatment including the businesses, Little League, Schools etc.

Someone asked timeframe and Paul Meneker replied not sure. Originally thought 2012, but this may be a little optimistic, as will have to file all over again and depends if there are hurdles along
the way etc.

Stadium will be available for concerts and community events such as high school graduations, Little League playoffs etc

Someone again voiced their concern of noise for the residents and the As repeated that study will have to be done and they have a feeling noise may not increase by much and may even have noise cancellation.

Another guest put forth that the main problem is that the residents are very unhappy and how are you going to convince and satisfy them otherwise? The As replied that they realize that they need to reach out to the residents and plan to do this in small groups and listen to their concerns and address them by finding solutions.

Some guest pointed out that it may be inconvenient to get access to their neighborhood. Residents will always get access was their reply.

Again the As pointed out that here would also be either security guards or police, signs, resident stickers etc

Another guest, Michelle from Baskin Robbins stated that you need to understand the resident concerns and need to solve the traffic issues.

Paul Meneker answered saying that when they built the San Jose Sharks, the residents of the Rose Garden there had the same concerns and now they are so happy and not one complaint. This is because we made sure all their concerns were addressed.

Nina Moore mentioned that the main thing to be done tonight is to get letters of support for the As in before the deadline of December 18, 4.00pm. If you can please sign the letter we hand out and give it back to us before you leave preferably.

Nina also mentioned that she would love to come into our homes and talk to small groups of residents about your concerns.

Nina - don't worry about residential to be built at Pacific Commons. Will have their own elementary school and will feed into Walters Middle and Kennedy High School.

Steve Cho asked - When is an economic study to be done? Wasn't clearly answered and As clarified that the Wolff family will 'front' the funding of the stadium until the money comes through on the building and sale of units of the residential complex at Pacific Commons.

Guest asked - When will the decision to "can" the original proposal of the stadium at pacific commons take place. Since Tuesday it has been pretty obvious that Pacific Commons will not work due to legal obstacles and that Warm Springs has now become the preferred
alternative.

The As again asked if before leaving if we could sign the standard letter and leave with them before we leave. I have a copy of the blank letter if needed by anyone. Also Steve Lloyd asked us to sign up for www.TheFremontBaseballVillage.com with your name, address, email, phone etc and they will keep us updated on developments and city council meetings etc

Adjourned 7.30pm

End of minutes

Well it looks like the fight is on!!!

Friday, December 12, 2008

The San Jose A's?

Several recent events would also allow the A's to discuss with San Jose. There is a perfect site available for the new stadium. The A's and Cisco will certainly much prefer their new stadium to be called "The Cisco Field of the San Jose A's" (see Lucky? San Jose). This would be a win-win-win-win-win-win-win-win-win solution for the A's, Cisco, Fremont residents, Pacific Common retailers, City of San Jose, MLB, BART, MTC, ABAG etc.

Please visit the blog: http://newballpark.blogspot.com/ for more information about the San Jose A's. There are many useful information and very good analysis (they are the professionals). They have been follow this event way before we realize.

Please help the A's move to their dream location and become a great team called the San Jose A's.


Go A's, in San Jose

Letter From an A's Fan
If you have time, please enjoy the story An Inconvenient Truth.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Tri-City Beat

Add this Tri-City Beat blog (http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/). It has many useful background information.